Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Michael Foods in Pricing Case

MINNETONKA, Minn. (January 18, 2010 - PRNewswire)—A federal appeals court directed that judgment be entered in favor of Michael Foods, Inc. in a long-running pricing case brought under the Robinson-Patman Act.

The case, Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc. and Sodexo, Inc., was filed in 2004. In the suit, Feesers, a regional food distributor based in Pennsylvania, claimed that it competes with Sodexo, Inc., a multinational food service management company, and that Michael Foods was required to sell its products to both companies at the same price. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Feesers' claim, holding that Feesers and Sodexo are not competing purchasers.

"We are obviously pleased with the Third Circuit's decision," said James E. Dwyer, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Michael Foods, Inc.

In the precedential decision, the Third Circuit said Feesers and Sodexo compete only when a prospective customer is deciding between self-operation and outsourcing of its food service operations. Because sales of Michael Foods products occur after the customer has made that decision, the Third Circuit found no competition between Feesers and Sodexo in sales of Michael Foods products. With no competition, the Court said, there could be no competitive injury to Feesers.

The Third Circuit's unanimous opinion reverses an April, 2009 decision by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania finding that Michael Foods and Sodexo violated the Robinson-Patman Act. It also reverses a subsequent District Court Order requiring Michael Foods to sell products to Feesers and Sodexo at the same price.

Michael Foods, Inc., headquartered in Minnetonka, Minnesota, produces and distributes food products for the food service, retail and food-ingredient markets. Its principal products are specialty egg products, refrigerated potato products, cheese and other dairy products.

Michael Foods was represented by Roy T. Englert, Jr. of Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner in Washington, D.C., and by J. Scott Ballenger, Maureen E. Mahoney, Jennifer L. Giordano and Margaret M. Zwisler of Latham & Watkins, LLP in Washington, D.C.

SOURCE Michael Foods, Inc.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Financing

In Red Lobster, a symbol of the challenges with casual dining

The Bottom Line: Consumers have shifted dining toward convenience or occasions, and that has created havoc for full-service restaurant chains. How can these companies get customers back?

Financing

Crumbl may be the next frozen yogurt, or the next Krispy Kreme

The Bottom Line: With word that the chain’s unit volumes took a nosedive last year, its future, and that of its operators, depends on what the brand does next.

Technology

4 things we learned in a wild week for restaurant tech

Tech Check: If you blinked, you may have missed three funding rounds, two acquisitions, a “never-before-seen” new product and a bold executive poaching. Let’s get caught up.

Trending

More from our partners