Operations

Senate votes to avert a rail strike

The move will spare restaurants from what industry leaders warned would be a disastrous supply situation.
Trains will keep on rolling. / Photo: Shutterstock

The U.S. Senate has followed the House of Representatives in voting to impose a new labor contract on railroad workers, averting a strike that was expected to be disastrous for restaurants and the economy as a whole.

The bill now heads to President Biden, who is certain to sign the resolution into law.

The National Restaurant Association had cited the avoidance of a nationwide rail strike as its top legislative priority for the remainder of 2022.  

About 30% of processed foods are believed to be transported via rail at some point in their journey to American consumers’ plates. Industry leaders had warned that a strike would have shifted transportation of those and other supplies exclusively to trucks, further taxing a supply chain that is already beset by product shortages and logistical problems, including a lack of drivers. About 467,000 more trucks would have been needed on the roads to offset a cancellation of rail shipments, according to the Association of American Railroads.

Rail workers were threatening to strike after four of the 12 unions representing them rejected the new contracts offered by employers. The walkout would have begun on Dec. 9.

The new labor pacts provide workers with a 24% raise over five years. But the contracts did not provide the seven paid sick days employees had demanded. Passage of a resolution forcing rail workers to accept the new contract looked iffy after the Senate voted down a separate bill that would have provided the requested paid sick time. The House had approved a stand-alone bill entitling workers to the time off.

Yet the measure passed handily in the Senate by a bipartisan vote of 80-15.

Congress has the right to impose a labor contract on railroad workers under a law that was passed in 1926 to prevent a disruption of interstate commerce. Using that power, universally seen as anti-union, was dicey for Democrats because of their long-standing support of organized labor.

“It’s not an easy call, but I think we have to do it,” President Biden said earlier this week. “The economy is at risk.”

Proponents of a settlement had warned that the nation would have been sapped $2 billion per day in economic activity if a strike was called. Economists projected that as many as 750,000 Americans would have lost their jobs at least temporarily. Included would have been about 115,000 rail workers.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Operations

Hitting resistance elsewhere, ghost kitchens and virtual concepts find a happy home in family dining

Reality Check: Old-guard chains are finding the alternative operations to be persistently effective side hustles.

Financing

The Tijuana Flats bankruptcy highlights the dangers of menu miscues

The Bottom Line: The fast-casual chain’s problems following new menu debuts in 2021 and 2022 show that adding new items isn’t always the right idea.

Financing

For Papa Johns, the CEO departure came at the wrong time

The Bottom Line: The pizza chain worked to convince franchisees to buy into a massive marketing shift. And then the brand’s CEO left.

Trending

More from our partners