Workforce

Quick-service restaurant chains make a last-ditch effort to kill California's Fast Act

Opponents of the landmark legislation, which would give employees a say in setting wages, are working to get Gov. Gavin Newsom to veto the bill.
Photograph: Shutterstock

Fast-food chains operating in California are pressing Gov. Gavin Newsom to veto a bill that gives the state’s quick-service workers a significant role in setting their own wages and working conditions.

Without a veto of AB 257 by the governor, quick-service operators face the possibility of a near-term jump in the state’s minimum wage to $22 an hour, with the level raised by 3.5% or the cost of living every year thereafter, depending on which is lower.

Employers could also be required to make changes in their operations or the physical setup of their restaurants to address any safety concerns of employees and unions.

The International Franchise Association, one of the groups pressuring the governor, has warned that the pressure on margins will force limited-service restaurants to raise their menu prices by 20% and eliminate jobs.

“Gov. Newsom must veto this bill—it’s not the way to help workers, consumers or businesses thrive,” Alex Johnson, a franchisee of 11 fast-food restaurants, said in a statement issued by an opposition coalition called Stop AB 257.

Advocates contend that the measure is necessary to protect fast-food workers from possible injury and being denied or cheated out of a reasonable wage by unscrupulous employers

“We look forward to Gov. Newsom signing AB 257 into law and empowering us to create safe and healthy workplaces across the fast-food industry,” Anneisha Williams, an employee of a quick-service restaurant in  Los Angeles, said in a statement from the union-affiliated Fight for $15 and a Union.

Proponents of AB 257 say franchisees like Johnson are pawns of multi-billion-dollar franchise organizations, while opponents blast the supporters as unwitting dupes of labor unions, which would also be given a voice in setting fast-food wages and working conditions.

The first-of-its kind legislation, also known as the Fast Act, was passed by the state Senate on Monday. The state Assembly passed a slightly different version in January and then adopted the Senate's changes late Monday night. 

A key provision of the bill is the creation of a stakeholder council with the power to set wages and management do’s and don’ts. The mandates would be binding on any California unit of a chain with at least 100 branches nationwide (see our chart for other components of both bills.)

The bill allows a similar wage-setting council to be set up for any community with at least 200,000 residents.

Two of the panel’s 10 seats will be reserved for fast-food workers, and two more for union representatives.

Another two places will be given to restaurant franchisees, and two more to representatives of franchisors.

The last two places would be given to state officials.

The council would be empowered to meet and consider the fairness of fast-food wages twice a year.

A veto could be fast-food employers' last chance to defeat the Fast Act. The final legislation will be submitted to the governor, who can either sign it into law or reject it by sending it back to the legislature. 

 

 

 

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Financing

Despite their complaints, customers keep flocking to Chipotle

The Bottom Line: The chain continued to be a juggernaut last quarter, with strong sales and traffic growth, despite frequent social media complaints about shrinkflation or other challenges.

Operations

Hitting resistance elsewhere, ghost kitchens and virtual concepts find a happy home in family dining

Reality Check: Old-guard chains are finding the alternative operations to be persistently effective side hustles.

Financing

The Tijuana Flats bankruptcy highlights the dangers of menu miscues

The Bottom Line: The fast-casual chain’s problems following new menu debuts in 2021 and 2022 show that adding new items isn’t always the right idea.

Trending

More from our partners