Food

What customers are saying about the BK Minis

The introduction a few weeks ago of Burger King’s mini-sandwiches was relatively low-key, perhaps a reflection of the limited-time options not being completely new. Now they’re called Minis, built around either a Munchkin-scale beef or chicken patty. But the burger version had a turn in the spotlight less then three years ago, using the stage name Burger Shots.

The repackaging seems to be as much a topic of discussion among bloggers and citizen-reviewers as the burgers themselves. Strangely, many fondly recalled the Shots. They were much less positive about the Minis, though many of the negative comments seem based on unit-level preparation of the mini-sandwiches, not the products themselves.

The exception seemed to be the nutritional composition of the chicken Minis: 820 calories for the smallest serving, a packet of four. Both versions also come in packs of eight and 12. Many of the commentators asserted that all three serving options are bargain-priced, at $2.99, $5.99 and $7.99, respectively.

Here’s a sampling of what’s being said about the Minis:

Yuck. They were dry and sloppily thrown together and gross-looking. They each had a speckle of ketchup and a pickle and nothing else. And the meats are connected! It’s like a big burger that was stamped with a cookie cutter, then dried out, then put in a box and shaken. I won’t be getting these again.
Bradaptation

Had the chicken ones, very good, much bigger than I expected, and only 2.99 for a four pack. Great buy IMO.
Chris, GrubGrade

810 calories for the chicken minis?!?
graciHas, GrubGrade

[on Chicken Mini:] The sole mini I ate was cold and stringy in the middle with a texture like a rubber ball. The pickle was lost in the overall suckage of this sandwich, leaving behind a texture and nothing more. It was moist on the inside, though, that being its only saving grace.
Foodette

The first bite was a surprise - it was initially amazing. The bun was the best bun I may have ever had from a national fast food chain. It was warm and soft like it had just been freshly baked. And the chicken was crispy. I was hit with a strong reaction: this tasted remarkably similar to my beloved KFC Chicken Littles. But then I chewed it a little more. This was not a Chicken Little. The chicken, while definitely crispy, had no chicken flavor.
An Immovable Feast

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Financing

Reassessing McDonald's tech deals from 2019

The Bottom Line: The fast-food giant’s decision to end its drive-thru AI test with IBM is the latest pullback away from a pair of technology acquisitions it made five years ago.

Operations

Trend or fad? These restaurant currents could go either way

Reality Check: A number of ripples were evident in the business during the first half of the year. The question is, do they have staying power?

Financing

Starbucks' value offer is a bad idea

The Bottom Line: It’s not entirely clear that price is the reason Starbucks is losing traffic. If it isn’t, the company’s new value offer could backfire.

Trending

More from our partners