Supreme Court raises hopes for swipe-fee moderation

credit card swipe fees

Trade groups are cheering the Supreme Court’s refusal yesterday to hear an appeal of a lower court decision that hampered credit card companies’ ability to raise processing fees.

Hearing the appeal would have raised the possibility of reinstating a controversial settlement between two major credit card companies and a group of retailers. Other merchants say the group wasn’t representative of all businesses that accept credit cards yet acted as if it was, and that it accepted a bad deal. The financial component of the $7.25 billion settlement would have resulted in payments of a few hundred dollars to some merchants.

In addition, opponents say one of the provisions would have left credit card companies with a clear path toward additional increases in swipe fees, the charges levied on merchants for processing credit card payments. The deal called for further increases to be passed along directly to consumers as a surcharge.  Merchants opposed to the settlement said they were opposed to increases, regardless of who paid for them, since higher fees ultimately cut into spending and profits.

The settlement was challenged by merchants’ groups and ultimately overturned because a court agreed the whole retail community was not adequately represented. But credit card companies appealed that decision, pushing it to the Supreme Court.

Yesterday, the court refused to hear the measure, letting the rejection of the settlement stand. “Retailers were skeptical of this settlement from the beginning,” said Mallory Duncan, SVP and general counsel of the National Retail Federation, in a statement. “It would have done nothing to keep swipe fees from rising in the future. It was nobody’s idea of a good settlement.”

“If this settlement had been approved, the structure of fees that drive up the prices of everything consumers buy would have been cemented into place forever,” Duncan said. “Now something can finally be done to bring these fees under control.”

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Food

Inside Chili's quest to craft a value-priced burger that could take on McDonald's

Behind the Menu: How the casual-dining chain smashes expectations with a winning combination of familiarity and price with its new Big Smasher burger.

Financing

Here's the big problem with all these $5 meal deals

The Bottom Line: With McDonald’s planning a $5 value meal of its own, more brands are already jumping onto the bandwagon. But not everybody will pay $5.

Financing

What did the Starbucks CEO expect?

The Bottom Line: Howard Schultz needed just one bad quarter to make public his displeasure with the coffee shop chain. But the stage was set for that two years ago.

Trending

More from our partners