OPINIONFinancing

Mystery’s over: New data pinpoints the cause of restaurants’ traffic slide

The research shows that saturation theorists were correct in attributing traffic problems to a development binge.
Photograph: Shutterstock

Let the gloating begin: New research mathematically demonstrates that saturation theorists were correct in attributing restaurants’ traffic problems to a development binge. 

Some might call it a bender. Between 2013 and 2018, the number of chain restaurants jumped by 12.3%, or four times faster than the pool of consumers grew, according to researcher TDn2K. As a direct result, the company told attendees of its Global Best Practices Conference on Monday, guest counts dropped an average of 9% at chain outlets that were open for at least that five-year stretch. And that was despite a roughly 1% increase in the total number of transactions, the firm noted. 

The damage wasn’t spread equally across the chain sector. Traffic at conventional quick-service restaurants actually rose 3.6% on a per-unit basis between 2013 and 2018, TDn2K said. But that, according to the researcher, was the lone sector to net new patrons. A fast-casual restaurant operating during that time frame suffered a decline of about 14%, even though the whole fast-casual sector was largely the industry’s growth engine for the period. Which might be why it suffered so much over the five years.

The competition was particularly steep for full-service places because of the challenge successfully posed by independent restaurants. “Independents are definitely making an impact on those of you competing in the full-service segments,” Sheryl Coyne-Batson, TDn2K’s VP of strategic partnerships, told the audience of restaurant chain executives.

But, she said, “the good news is chains are still winning that game.” Collectively, chain outlets drove 57% of the industry’s total gain in guest traffic, according to TDn2K customers.

Although the industry has seen traffic steadily slip on a per-restaurant basis for a long stretch, there’s not been a consensus on why. Many observers have contended that the balance of restaurant supply and demand has been thrown way out of whack by all the private-equity capital that has flowed to operations in recent years. But others attributed the slide to increased competition from other channels, particularly supermarkets, c-stores and new share-of-stomach contenders such as meal kits. Still others point to heightened desire to nest at home and stream Netflix instead of using restaurants for entertainment.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Leadership

Restaurants bring the industry's concerns to Congress

Neary 600 operators made their case to lawmakers as part of the National Restaurant Association’s Public Affairs Conference.

Financing

Podcast transcript: Virtual Dining Brands co-founder Robbie Earl

A Deeper Dive: What is the future of digital-only concepts? Earl discusses their work to ensure quality and why focusing on restaurant delivery works.

Financing

In the fast-casual sector, Chipotle laps Panera Bread

The Bottom Line: The two fast-casual restaurant pioneers have diverged over the past five years, as the burrito chain has thrived while Panera hit a wall. Here's why.

Trending

More from our partners