Ind. addresses restaurateurs’ new issue: Scheduling restrictions

clock schedule calendar

The Indiana Senate approved a bill yesterday that prohibits county and municipal governments from passing laws that inhibit the ability of restaurants and other employers to make short-term changes in workers’ schedules.

The move was the latest action on an emerging issue for restaurants. Some areas want to make the income levels of hourly workers more predictable by preventing employers from changing work schedules days or hours before a shift begins. The regulations typically also prohibit employers from sending workers home mid-shift if business is slow.

San Francisco passed a law in 2014 that requires employees to provide monthly work schedules, with penalties assessed if changes are made short-term. The legislation is intended to help workers manage their income with more foresight and less fluctuation from paycheck to paycheck.

Similar legislation was subsequently introduced in the California legislature.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) introduced federal legislation last summer that set new scheduling rules specifically for the restaurant, retail and foodservice industries. The bill required employers in those fields to provide new hires with a guarantee of hours and a work schedule that could not be changed within 14 days of a shift.

A proposal introduced last month in the District of Columbia would require that employees of chain restaurants be provided with a schedule 21 days ahead of time. If the schedule should change within that time, the employer would have to compensate the affected worker with pay for four hours of work.

The measure also prohibits restaurants and retailers from hiring new employees until they have increased the hours of their existing workforce.

In Indiana, no legislation restricting restaurateurs’ scheduling flexibility apparently has been introduced. The bill approved by the state would prohibit local areas from passing scheduling rules and restrictions.  Proponents say the measure is necessary to prevent a patchwork of regulations from arising for restaurants and other industries with a high population of hourly employees.

The bill has been forwarded to the state’s house of representatives.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.


Exclusive Content


Restaurants have a hot opportunity to improve their reputation as employers

Reality Check: New mandates for protecting workers from dangerous on-the-job heat are about to be dropped on restaurants and other employers. The industry could greatly help its labor plight by acting first.


Some McDonald's customers are doubling up on the discounts

The Bottom Line: In some markets, customers can get the fast-food chain's $5 value meal for $4. The situation illustrates a key rule in the restaurant business: Customers are savvy and will find loopholes.


Ignore the Red Lobster problem. Sale-leasebacks are not all that bad

The decade-old sale-leaseback at the seafood chain has raised questions about the practice. But experts say it remains a legitimate financing option for operators when done correctly.


More from our partners