Marketing

Chipotle to pay $6.5M to settle class-action suit over non-GMO claims

The fast-casual chain admits no wrongdoing in the case, which ends three years of litigation.
Photograph courtesy of Chipotle Mexican Grill

Chipotle Mexican Grill will pay $6.5 million to settle a class-action suit that accused the fast casual of falsely advertising that its food is free of genetically modified ingredients, according to documents filed this week in California federal court.

The settlement, in which Chipotle admits no wrongdoing, ends three years of litigation against the 2,500-unit chain. It entitles anyone who purchased food from any Chipotle unit in the U.S. from April 27, 2015, until June 30, 2016, to $2 back on each qualifying purchase, with the ability to claim up to five qualifying purchases without documentation. Those with proof of purchase can be awarded up to $20 for 10 qualifying purchases during the period, with a $30 per-household cap, according to the settlement.

A Chipotle representative did not immediately respond to RB’s request to comment on the settlement.

In 2015, Chipotle became the first major restaurant chain to announce it would start serving food entirely free of genetically engineered ingredients, after becoming the first national restaurant company to disclose GMO ingredients two years earlier. At the time, Chipotle said most of the genetically modified ingredients in its food were found in soybean oil and tortillas.

But in the class-action suit, the plaintiffs allege that Chipotle’s food products “may have been sourced from livestock that consumed GMO animal feed.”

The $6.5 million settlement could serve as a point of caution for other brands as they consider their marketing messages.

For its part, Chipotle said its GMO-related marketing campaigns are “true, are substantiated through science, and are therefore not deceptive or misleading as a matter of law,” according to the court filing.

Earlier this week, Chipotle became the first restaurant chain to be targeted under New York City’s Fair Workweek Law, with the city accusing the chain of violating its predictable scheduling rule.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Financing

In Red Lobster, a symbol of the challenges with casual dining

The Bottom Line: Consumers have shifted dining toward convenience or occasions, and that has created havoc for full-service restaurant chains. How can these companies get customers back?

Financing

Crumbl may be the next frozen yogurt, or the next Krispy Kreme

The Bottom Line: With word that the chain’s unit volumes took a nosedive last year, its future, and that of its operators, depends on what the brand does next.

Technology

4 things we learned in a wild week for restaurant tech

Tech Check: If you blinked, you may have missed three funding rounds, two acquisitions, a “never-before-seen” new product and a bold executive poaching. Let’s get caught up.

Trending

More from our partners