Operations

Starbucks zeroes in on waste reduction

The coffee giant says it loses $500 million each year to waste.

Starbucks is doubling down on its waste-reduction efforts, laying out plans to cut its waste costs by about 15% over the next 18 months.

The coffee company loses about $500 million each year to waste, executives revealed during a recent earnings call.

“That figure will always be significant because product availability combined with our strict product quality requirements inherently result in a certain amount of waste in our business model,” CEO Kevin Johnson said during the call.

Lower-performing units typically have the highest amount of waste, Starbucks executives said.

“We’re going after each one of those stores to improve their waste performance by store–very detailed work,” Starbucks Chief Operating Officer Rosalind Brewer said during the call.

Recently, Starbucks has targeted stores that generate the highest amount of waste as a percentage of sales with training focused on bakery pull-to-thaw processes.

Waste reduction is also being considered as Starbucks develops its Mercato line of grab-and-go salads, sandwiches and snack boxes, Brewer said.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Financing

Will Subway make Roark Capital too dominant? Not really

The Bottom Line: The addition of the sandwich giant will make Roark a bigger player than McDonald's in the U.S. But its position in the sandwich market will not be all that unusual.

Financing

Restaurants still look expensive, and consumers are reacting

The Bottom Line: Restaurants have stepped off the pricing gas. But sales are slowing and traffic is weak, and more operators are turning to price promotions.

Operations

Does California just hate restaurants?

Reality Check: The industry's largest state market is about to hit the business, a significant part of its economy, with all sorts of changes and new burdens. What gives?

Trending

More from our partners