Operations

Civil rights attorney joins franchisees’ lawsuit against McDonald’s

Daryl Parks, who has represented families of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Corey Jones, has joined a pair of lawsuits against the chain.
Mcdonalds lawsuits
Photograph: Shutterstock

Daryl Parks, a notable civil rights attorney who has represented the families of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Corey Jones, has joined the law firm leading a pair of discrimination lawsuits filed against McDonald’s.

Parks has joined the Ferraro Law Firm as senior counsel and will be part of the lawsuit filed by current and former Black franchisees against the company—some 77 mostly former operators are suing the Chicago-based burger giant.

Parks is not the first big name to be involved in the lawsuit—former U.S. attorney general Loretta Lynch is representing McDonald’s, which has blasted franchisees’ lawsuit as “illogical.”

The presence of both attorneys suggests a potentially major battle over McDonald’s treatment of operators. A major group of former franchisees has sued the chain, claiming they have not been afforded the same opportunities as White operators. A pair of existing McDonald’s operators have made similar claims in a separate but similar lawsuit.

James Ferraro, lead attorney for both of the lawsuits, called Parks “a legal giant in the civil rights community.”

The current and former franchisees have argued in their lawsuits that they have been restricted to the costliest and worst-performing markets and not given the support afforded to White operators.

Much of it is based on data from the National Black McDonald’s Operators Association, or NBMOA, saying that the gap in cash flow between Black franchisees and others has tripled between 2010 and 2019. They also argue that the number of Black McDonald’s franchisees has been cut in half since the 1990s.

The former franchisees’ lawsuit alone could cost McDonald’s up to $1.5 billion in punitive damages.

McDonald’s, for its part, has fought hard against the allegations, saying that it has a vested interest in assuring its franchisees are successful. “On its face, this claim is illogical as it suggests the company somehow has an interest in undermining its franchisees and seeing them fail,” McDonald’s said in a court filing in October.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Emerging Brands

The race is on for a piece of the pickleball pie

New concepts seem to pop up daily. Here's a look at how the pickleball eatertainment landscape is taking shape.

Financing

Will Subway make Roark Capital too dominant? Not really

The Bottom Line: The addition of the sandwich giant will make Roark a bigger player than McDonald's in the U.S. But its position in the sandwich market will not be all that unusual.

Financing

Restaurants still look expensive, and consumers are reacting

The Bottom Line: Restaurants have stepped off the pricing gas. But sales are slowing and traffic is weak, and more operators are turning to price promotions.

Trending

More from our partners