2 executives accuse McDonald’s of discrimination

A federal lawsuit alleges that the burger giant abandoned the African American market and purged black executives from the company.
McDonald's Ohio
Photograph courtesy of McDonald's Corp.

Two senior executives have accused McDonald’s Corp. of abandoning its commitment to racial equity under former CEO Steve Easterbrook and his replacement Chris Kempczinski, saying the company purged African Americans from senior leadership and “declared war against the African American community.”

The lawsuit, filed in a federal court in Illinois on Tuesday, accuses the company of using “strong-arm tactics” to drive certain franchisees out of the system, frequently targeting African American operators at a higher rate.

And it says the company largely abandoned the African American market, saying that it stopped advertising to that customer base, resulting in a steep decline in black customers.

The percentage of African American customers at McDonald’s declined to 14% in 2019 from what the lawsuit says was a historical rate of 20%.

“In shocking ways difficult to overstate, McDonald’s under Easterbrook and Kempczinski declared war against the African American community,” the lawsuit says.

McDonald’s denied the characterization of the company in the lawsuit, but said it is reviewing the allegations.

“At McDonald’s, our actions are rooted in our belief that a diverse, vibrant, inclusive and respectful company makes us stronger,” the company said in a statement. “In the U.S. in particular, 45% of corporate officers are people of color and all U.S. field vice presidents are people of color. While we disagree with characterizations in the complaint, we are currently reviewing it and will respond accordingly.”

The lawsuit represents a major test for Kempczinski, who was thrust into the CEO role in early November when Easterbrook was fired over a consensual relationship with a staffer. On Monday, Kempczinski sent a letter to employees as he looks to focus the company on its “core values.”

The lawsuit was filed by Vicki Guster-Hines and Domineca Neal, two senior executives at McDonald’s USA. Guster-Hines has worked with the company since 1987, while Neal has worked with the company since 2012.

The lawsuit names Easterbrook, Kempczinski and Charlie Strong, a zone president for the company’s Western U.S. markets, and whom the lawsuit says was used to carry out Kempczinski’s and Easterbrook’s “ruthless humiliation and expulsion of highly qualified African Americans.”

The lawsuit says that McDonald’s terminated 30 African American officers and demoted five others, including Guster-Hines and Neal, reducing the number of such executives from 42 to seven between 2014 and 2019.

But that reduction came as the company cut back on corporate overhead, thinning its number of executives overall. A company source said that the reduction in African American representation was proportionate to the overall reduction in the number of corporate officers.

In April of last year, a group of senior African American executives met with Kempczinski to discuss the lack of African American representation in upper management. During that meeting, the lawsuit says, Kempczinski said that “numbers don’t matter.”

It also says that the McDonald’s African American Council, or MA2C, “strangely went dormant” after Easterbrook was hired in 2015. Programs to support the African American talent development pipeline “quietly went away.”

The lawsuit says that Guster-Hines and Neal both protested the decline in the number of black franchisees. Nearly 1 out of 3 black operators have left the system since Easterbrook arrived, which the lawsuit says is “disproportionate to the loss of non-African American franchisees.”

McDonald’s in recent years has been shifting more of its restaurants into the hands of larger operators. That has led to an overall reduction in the number of franchisees in the system, though the total number of franchisees has been difficult to pin down.

The lawsuit says that the company has been using “strong-arm tactics to drive unwanted franchisees out of the system,” such as by grading franchise restaurants, for instance. The company then prevents the operators from selling their restaurants on the open market, pushing the stores to preferred operators.

“All McDonald’s franchisees are vulnerable to these strong-arm tactics,” the lawsuit says. But African American franchisees were disproportionately affected by these efforts, which drove them out in record numbers.

The complaint says that Guster-Hines and Neal were labeled “angry black women.” The lawsuit says McDonald’s “purged” its senior leadership of black executives, arguing that they were “less necessary” given that the company had fewer black customers and fewer black franchisees.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.


Exclusive Content


4 things we learned in a wild week for restaurant tech

Tech Check: If you blinked, you may have missed three funding rounds, two acquisitions, a “never-before-seen” new product and a bold executive poaching. Let’s get caught up.


High restaurant menu prices mean high customer expectations

The Bottom Line: Diners are paying high prices to eat out at all kinds of restaurants these days. And they’re picking winners and losers.


Podcast transcript: Puttshack CEO Joe Vrankin

A Deeper Dive: The chief executive of the minigolf-centric restaurant chain discusses how the chain focuses on higher-quality games and food.


More from our partners