Employee References: The Danger in Providing Inaccurate Information



In this case, the employee was hired into an unspecified management position for her former employer. Shortly thereafter, her former employer sent a company-wide e-mail introducing her as the vice president of daily operations. After working for her former employer for over a year, a new company hired the employee as a customer service manager.

The employee initially received positive reviews at her new company. However, the company's owner soon became dissatisfied with the employee's performance and decided to verify the employee's work experience with her former employer. When the owner called the employee's former employer, he did not request to speak with the human resources department or a corporate officer. Instead, he called the customer service department directly and on more than one occasion.

Each time the owner called, he asked what the employee's role was at her prior company. Every person the owner spoke with, including the customer service manager, stated that the employee was a customer service representative and had not been a supervisor or a vice president. Consequently, the owner fired the employee for misrepresenting her work experience. The employee then sued her former employer for negligent misrepresentation, defamation and tortious interference.

Although the lower court dismissed the employee's claims, on appeal, the Court found that the employee had presented sufficient evidence to proceed on her claim of negligent misrepresentation.

Negligent misrepresentation occurs when a party negligently provides false information, causing economic loss to an individual. The employee claimed that her former employer negligently represented her position with the company, resulting in her termination from her new company. The Court found that the employee was entitled to receive a determination as to whether her former employer and co-workers knew, or should have known, her correct title. The Court further noted that an employer that voluntarily responds to a request for a reference might be held liable for negligent misrepresentation if the employer provides misleading or incomplete information.

This case illustrates a very important lesson for employers - know who will provide references and what information that individual will relay to the employee's prospective, or current, employer. Employers should develop a policy for handling requests for references. While employers may wish to provide detailed references for former employees, they should adopt the policy of providing neutral references for former employees that reveal only titles and rates of pay.

Employers should also ensure that the individuals responding to reference requests are prepared to handle accurately such requests. Every employer should designate one official or department, such as the director of human resources, to provide references. All calls for references should be directed to this designated reference provider.

For example, the customer service department in this case should have directed the owner's calls to the Human Resources Department. The Human Resources Department then would have retained total control over what information was released to the owner. This centralized system would have drastically reduced the risk of releasing false or misleading information in response to the owner's reference requests. Finally, employers should effectively communicate their reference policies to all employees. A strong, well-known reference policy will best shield employers from potential legal liability for providing references.

  • Krupin O'Brien LLC is a nationally recognized law firm specializing in employment and labor law and exclusively representing employers in the areas of labor relations, employment law, business immigration and related litigation. The firm has a particular expertise in representing restaurants and the hospitality industry, and represents companies and ownership groups of all sizes, both local and nationally. For further information contact Ana Salper, an attorney with Krupin O'Brien LLC, where she represents clients on all forms of litigation, and counsels clients on diverse employment and labor matters. Ms. Salper oversees the firm's New York office and is a member of the New York State Bar. Contact her at: 212-745-1387 or ana@krupinobrien.com.
    ID Access invites its readers to address questions to Krupin O'Brien LLC by contacting The Editor.

    Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

    Multimedia

    Exclusive Content

    Financing

    Despite their complaints, customers keep flocking to Chipotle

    The Bottom Line: The chain continued to be a juggernaut last quarter, with strong sales and traffic growth, despite frequent social media complaints about shrinkflation or other challenges.

    Operations

    Hitting resistance elsewhere, ghost kitchens and virtual concepts find a happy home in family dining

    Reality Check: Old-guard chains are finding the alternative operations to be persistently effective side hustles.

    Financing

    The Tijuana Flats bankruptcy highlights the dangers of menu miscues

    The Bottom Line: The fast-casual chain’s problems following new menu debuts in 2021 and 2022 show that adding new items isn’t always the right idea.

    Trending

    More from our partners