Tyson settles suit alleging it fixed chicken prices

The poultry supplier admitted no wrongdoing as part of the agreement.
Tyson price fixing settlement
Photograph: Shutterstock

Tyson Foods has agreed to pay $221.5 million to settle the class action lawsuits filed against the poultry supplier by restaurants and other customers for allegedly colluding to fix the price of broilers over a 12-year stretch, the company said in a securities filing.

Tyson acknowledged no wrongdoing as part of the settlement, saying in its SEC filing that a resolution of the matter is in the best interest of shareholders. The company intends to reflect the payment in its financial results for the first quarter.

Plaintiffs in the antitrust litigation contend that Tyson and other suppliers conspired to raise and stabilize the price of chicken starting as early as Jan. 1, 2008 and continuing through 2019.

Tyson and other major chicken suppliers were also investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice for allegedly fixing prices and rigging bids starting in 2012 and continuing into early 2019. Tyson cooperated with the authorities.

The investigation has led to the indictment of 10 former executives of the companies, including Bill Lovett, the former CEO of Pilgrim’s Pride. The probe also involved Perdue Farms, Claxton Poultry and Koch Foods.

The Tyson settlement comes as chain after chain is adding a chicken sandwich to its menu, looking for the steep climb in sales that Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen enjoyed with its entrant in the field. The industry is waiting to see what impact that surge in menu listings might have on chicken prices.

Plaintiffs in the legal action settled by Tyson included restaurants, noncommercial foodservice facilities and consumers who purchased roasting chickens from grocery stores.


Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.


Exclusive Content


Why the Burgerim settlement exposes flaws in franchise oversight

The Bottom Line: The federal government allowed the chain’s founder to avoid major penalties by simply paying $1,000. What’s the point of regulation in the first place?


Why the Smashed Jack sparked record-smashing demand at Jack in the Box

Behind the Menu: The chain’s newest menu addition aims to break the mold on what a fast-food burger can be, and customers are buying in.


Why Wingstop isn't afraid of Popeyes' chicken wings

The Bottom Line: The fast-casual wing chain says its sales improve when another brand pushes the product. Here’s why that might be.


More from our partners